Skip to content
Home › SQL Comparisons › Fivetran HVR vs Qlik Replicate
Comparison · CDC & Replication

Fivetran HVR vs Qlik Replicate

Fivetran HVR and Qlik Replicate are both self-hosted, log-based replication products for large enterprise sources such as Oracle, SQL Server, Db2 and SAP. HVR uses a hub-and-agent design, is sold only on Fivetran's Business Critical plan and is billed by Monthly Active Rows per destination; Qlik Replicate runs as a server with a web console and is licensed by endpoint through a quote.

Last verified November 2026. Versions checked: Fivetran HVR 6.3, Qlik Replicate May 2026. Licensing and features change; check the official sources for the latest details.

Quick verdict

Short answer

Choose Fivetran HVR if you want agents close to each source and target, built-in compare jobs to verify data, usage billing in Monthly Active Rows, and the option to use other Fivetran connectors (SaaS, Hybrid Deployment or High-Volume Agent) from the same vendor. Choose Qlik Replicate if you need IMS, Salesforce or a wider mainframe and SAP source list, prefer a licence scoped to endpoints rather than row usage, and want a console-driven tool with transactional or batch optimized apply. Both are quote-based, so price them on your real change volumes and endpoint list.

How we know: This comparison is research-based: architecture, supported sources and targets, life cycle, apply options and pricing models were checked on 7 November 2026 against the Fivetran HVR 6 documentation and the Qlik Replicate May 2026 online help and pricing page. We have not run either product, so nothing here is a measured result.

Fivetran HVR (High-Volume Replicator, now HVR 6) is described by Fivetran as "a self-hosted version of Fivetran" for enterprise replication. An HVR Hub Server, with a repository database holding the replication definitions, schedules capture, integrate, refresh and compare jobs; optional HVR Agents on source or target machines connect to the hub over TLS. HVR 6.3 reached general availability on 11 December 2025 with regular support until 31 December 2028. It is sold on one plan, Business Critical, and the hub registers with a Fivetran account for its licence.

Qlik Replicate (formerly Attunity Replicate) is Qlik's client-managed CDC engine. A Replicate server on Windows or Linux runs tasks that perform a full load and then read the source transaction log, forwarding each committed transaction to the target; tasks are designed and monitored in a web console. The May 2026 release adds IMS as a native source and Db2 LUW, Cloudera Iceberg and Oracle ATP targets.

Side by side

AspectFivetran HVRQlik Replicate
Architecture Hub server with repository database, plus optional agents on source and target machines Replicate server with a web console; tasks connect to endpoints
Platforms Hub on Linux or Windows; agents on Linux, Windows, AIX and Solaris Windows Server 2016 to 2025; RHEL 8, 9, 10; Amazon Linux 2023
Mainframe and midrange sources Db2 for z/OS, Db2 for i and Db2 LUW Db2 for z/OS, iSeries and LUW, plus IMS (native from May 2026)
SAP sources SAP HANA; SAP NetWeaver on HANA or Oracle (capture only) SAP HANA and SAP application sources
Other sources Oracle, SQL Server and Azure SQL, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, Aurora, Sybase ASE, Ingres, YugabyteDB Oracle, SQL Server, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL, Sybase ASE, Informix, MongoDB, Salesforce
Analytics and streaming targets Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery, Redshift, Synapse, Teradata, SingleStore, Fabric SQL database, Kafka and others Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Fabric, Synapse, Databricks, Iceberg, Kafka, Kinesis, Pub/Sub, Event Hubs, object storage
Data validation Built-in compare jobs to check that source and target match Not documented as a built-in compare feature on the pages reviewed
Apply options Integrate jobs; apply modes not detailed on the pages reviewed Transactional apply or Batch optimized apply
Management Web UI, command line and REST API Web console per server; Qlik Enterprise Manager (separate) for many servers
Pricing model Business Critical plan only; Monthly Active Rows counted per destination, tiered per channel Quote; available endpoints depend on the licence
Support life cycle Three years per major HVR 6 release; 6.3 supported to 31 December 2028 Release train that drops older endpoint versions; check each release's end-of-support list

Key differences

Hub and agents versus a replication server

HVR is designed around a central hub and distributed agents. Agents can run on the source or target machines (including AIX and Solaris) and connect to the hub over TLS; capture reads the source transaction logs, compresses and optionally encrypts the changes, and routes them through the hub to the integrate side. That suits estates with many sources across data centres or networks, where you want capture close to each database and a single point of control. The hub needs its own repository database and must be registered with a Fivetran account.

Qlik Replicate centres on a Replicate server that connects to source and target endpoints and runs tasks; the web console on the same server is used to design and monitor them. For many servers, Qlik sells Qlik Enterprise Manager separately. The mainframe route is native endpoints for Db2 for z/OS and, from May 2026, IMS, which replaces the legacy Attunity Replicate Connect (ARC) agents. In practice both can cover a multi-site estate; the question is whether you prefer HVR's agent topology or a set of Replicate servers under Enterprise Manager.

Source coverage

Both cover the core enterprise databases: Oracle, SQL Server, Db2 on all three platforms, SAP HANA, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB and Sybase ASE. The documented differences are at the edges. HVR lists SAP NetWeaver on HANA or Oracle (capture only), Ingres and YugabyteDB, and its agents run on AIX and Solaris. Qlik Replicate lists IMS, Informix, MongoDB and Salesforce as sources and SAP application sources. If any of those is on your list, it may decide the choice before price does.

Applying and verifying changes

Qlik Replicate documents two change processing modes. Transactional apply applies each transaction individually, in commit order, which keeps strict referential integrity; tables without a primary key or unique index always use it. Batch optimized apply groups changes into batches for throughput, which Qlik says may affect transactional integrity, and it is not supported for tables with foreign keys. Choose per task based on whether the target is an operational database or an analytics store.

HVR's documented differentiator here is verification: compare jobs check whether source and target hold the same data, next to refresh jobs that load or reload targets. For regulated or high-value replication, a built-in compare reduces the need for separate reconciliation scripts. A simple manual check of the kind compare automates looks like this:

-- Quick row count and checksum on source and target (SQL Server)
SELECT COUNT(*)                           AS row_count,
       CHECKSUM_AGG(BINARY_CHECKSUM(*))   AS table_checksum
FROM dbo.orders;

Pricing: Monthly Active Rows versus endpoint licences

HVR is sold only on Fivetran's Business Critical plan, which allows on-premises deployment. Fivetran defines MAR for HVR as "the number of distinct primary keys synced or replicated from a source location to a target location" in a calendar month, and says that when one source feeds several destinations, MAR is counted for each destination. Tiers apply per channel, so the cost per MAR falls as a single channel grows. No rate is published; Fivetran points to its estimator. The older Private Deployment plan is deprecated.

Qlik Replicate has no published price: client-managed products are sold through sales, and the endpoints you can use depend on your licence. In our view, MAR billing tracks how much data changes, which favours large but slow-changing tables, while an endpoint licence tracks how many systems you connect, which favours a few very busy sources. Fan-out to several targets raises HVR's MAR and also adds target endpoints to a Replicate licence, so model both.

Pricing and licensing

Fivetran HVR. Per Fivetran's "Pricing for HVR" page, checked 7 November 2026: a single plan, Business Critical, billed by Monthly Active Rows (distinct primary keys replicated from a source location to a target location in a month, counted for each destination) with channel-level usage tiers. The hub's Fivetran registration supplies an automatically refreshing licence key; if registration is removed before the contract ends, access stops after seven days. No per-MAR price is published.

Qlik Replicate. No list price. Qlik's data integration pricing page shows only Qlik Talend Cloud editions with Contact Us and routes client-managed products through sales; Replicate licences are scoped to the endpoints you need.

Pricing checked on the vendors' official pages on 7 November 2026. Prices change; confirm before buying.

Where each one leads

Fivetran HVR strengths

  • Hub and agent design with compressed, optionally encrypted transfer over TLS
  • Built-in compare jobs to verify source and target consistency
  • Agents on AIX and Solaris as well as Linux and Windows
  • Published three-year support window for each major HVR 6 release
  • Same vendor as the Fivetran SaaS, Hybrid Deployment and High-Volume Agent connectors

Qlik Replicate strengths

  • Native IMS (from May 2026), Db2 for z/OS and SAP application sources
  • Salesforce, MongoDB and Informix sources alongside relational databases
  • Choice of transactional apply or batch optimized apply
  • Wide streaming target list: Kafka, Kinesis, Pub/Sub and Event Hubs
  • Console-driven task design on Windows or Linux

Limitations

Fivetran HVR limitations

  • Only sold on the Business Critical plan, with no published MAR rate
  • MAR is counted for each destination, so fan-out raises cost
  • The hub needs a Fivetran account registration for its licence
  • HVR 6 is not compatible with HVR 5.x or 4.x, so older installs need migration

Qlik Replicate limitations

  • No published price; licences are tied to specific endpoints
  • Batch optimized apply is not supported for tables with foreign keys
  • Managing many servers needs Qlik Enterprise Manager, sold separately
  • Each release retires older endpoint versions, such as MySQL 8.0 sources in May 2026

When to choose each

Choose Fivetran HVR if

  • You want capture agents on or near each source, including AIX or Solaris hosts
  • Built-in source-to-target compare is a requirement
  • Usage-based billing fits better than endpoint licences, for example few targets and stable data
  • You already use Fivetran and want one vendor for SaaS and self-hosted replication

Choose Qlik Replicate if

  • IMS, Salesforce, MongoDB or SAP application sources are in scope
  • You prefer a licence based on endpoints rather than rows changed
  • You need to choose between strict transactional apply and batch apply per task
  • You stream to Kinesis, Pub/Sub or Event Hubs as well as warehouses

When neither is right

Final recommendation

Bottom line

These two are close competitors for self-hosted enterprise replication, so the decision usually turns on specifics. Fivetran HVR fits teams that want a hub-and-agent topology, built-in compare and MAR billing from the Fivetran vendor. Qlik Replicate fits teams with IMS, Salesforce or SAP application sources, or who prefer endpoint licensing and a console with explicit apply modes. List every source, target and expected monthly change volume, confirm documented support on both sides, and compare quotes for the same scope.

Frequently asked questions

Is Fivetran HVR the same as the Fivetran SaaS service?

No. HVR is a self-hosted product with its own hub and agents. The main Fivetran service runs as SaaS or Hybrid Deployment, and Fivetran also offers High-Volume Agent connectors for some database sources in those models.

How is Fivetran HVR billed?

Only on the Business Critical plan, by Monthly Active Rows: distinct primary keys replicated from a source to a target in a month, counted for each destination, with tiers per channel. Fivetran does not publish an HVR rate.

Does Qlik Replicate support IMS?

Yes. The May 2026 release adds IMS as a native source, replacing the legacy Attunity Replicate Connect (ARC) route. Fivetran HVR's 6.3.5 capabilities list Db2 for z/OS but not IMS.

Which one verifies that source and target match?

Fivetran HVR documents built-in compare jobs for this. We did not find an equivalent built-in compare feature on the Qlik Replicate pages reviewed, so ask Qlik how it handles reconciliation for your endpoints.

Sources

Checked November 2026.

How we research comparisons: our editorial method.

More comparisons

Browse all SQL comparisons or the tools directory.