Quick verdict
Choose Apache Cassandra if you need a genuinely open source licence with no usage caps, want the 5.0 feature set (Storage Attached Indexes, vector type, Unified Compaction Strategy), or want to choose freely among managed providers and support vendors. Choose ScyllaDB if you want a single vendor that builds, supports and can run the database for you (ScyllaDB X Cloud), you value its tablets-based data distribution and DynamoDB-compatible Alternator API, and you accept a source-available licence: free self-managed use stops at 10 TB and 50 vCPUs, and only for organisations that have not been paying customers in the past 12 months. ScyllaDB ended its open source edition after 6.2.x, so do not plan around a free AGPL release.
Apache Cassandra is a distributed wide-column database from the Apache Software Foundation. Tables are defined by a partition key, which decides which nodes hold a row, and clustering columns that order rows within a partition; every node can serve reads and writes, and the client chooses a consistency level per request. Cassandra 5.0 became GA on 5 September 2024, and 5.0.9 (7 August 2026) is the latest release, with 4.1 and 4.0 still maintained. It is free under the Apache License 2.0. See our Apache Cassandra profile.
ScyllaDB is a distributed wide-column database from ScyllaDB, Inc. that speaks CQL, so Cassandra drivers and data models carry over, and also offers Alternator, an Amazon DynamoDB-compatible API. It is written in C++ and splits each node's data by CPU core. Recent releases use tablets for data distribution (recommended for all new clusters from 2026.1) and Raft for cluster metadata; 2026.3 was announced on 8 September 2026. See our ScyllaDB profile.
Lifecycle note. In December 2024 ScyllaDB announced the end of its open source edition. ScyllaDB Open Source 6.2.x (AGPL) is the final open source release; from ScyllaDB 2025.1 there is one source-available release stream under the ScyllaDB Software License Agreement (v1.1, updated 12 April 2026). Older AGPL builds still exist, but they no longer receive new releases, so this page compares Cassandra with current, source-available ScyllaDB.
Side by side
| Aspect | Apache Cassandra | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Apache License 2.0, no usage limits | ScyllaDB Software License Agreement (source-available); last open source release 6.2.x (AGPL) |
| Free self-managed use | Unlimited | Only for organisations with no paid ScyllaDB relationship in the previous 12 months, up to 10 TB storage and 50 vCPUs in total |
| Governance and vendor | Apache Software Foundation project; support and managed services from several third parties | Single vendor, ScyllaDB, Inc. |
| Implementation | Java (runs on the JVM; JDK 17 supported in 5.0) | C++ with a shard-per-core design inside each node |
| Data distribution | Token ring with automatic placement by partition key hash | Tablets (recommended for new clusters from 2026.1) or legacy vNodes |
| APIs | CQL | CQL plus Alternator (DynamoDB-compatible API) |
| Compatibility baseline | Cassandra 5.0 is the reference | ScyllaDB documents itself as a drop-in replacement for Cassandra 3.11 with some 4.0 features; CQL native protocol v4, with some v5 features |
| Consistency | Tunable per request (ONE, QUORUM, LOCAL_QUORUM, ALL and others) | Tunable per request like Cassandra; strongly consistent keyspaces experimental in 2026.3 |
| Transactions | Lightweight transactions (compare-and-set) per partition | Lightweight transactions; no multi-partition ACID transactions documented |
| Search and vectors | Storage Attached Indexes and a vector type with similarity functions (5.0) | Vector search and full-text search with BM25 scoring (2026.3) |
| Managed service | None from the project; third parties such as Astra DB (IBM) and Amazon Keyspaces (CQL-compatible) | ScyllaDB X Cloud from the vendor |
| Published prices | Free software; managed services priced by their vendors | No rates published for X Cloud or commercial licences |
Key differences
Licence: open source versus source-available with limits
This is the biggest change in the comparison since 2024. Cassandra is Apache 2.0: you can run it at any scale, modify it, offer it as a service and buy support or hosting from whichever vendor you like. ScyllaDB's current licence (v1.1, 12 April 2026) grants free use only to "Never Customers", meaning organisations with no paid relationship with ScyllaDB in the previous 12 months, and only up to 10 TB of total storage and 50 vCPUs across all clusters. It also assigns modifications to ScyllaDB, allows audits, licence keys and telemetry, forbids offering ScyllaDB as a service, and is governed by Israeli law.
In practice, a small self-managed ScyllaDB cluster may run free, but a growing one, or any organisation that has ever paid for ScyllaDB in the past year, needs a commercial licence or X Cloud. Have your legal team read the licence before you choose, and plan what happens when you cross the limits.
Engine design and data distribution
Cassandra is written in Java and places data on a token ring by hashing the partition key, with replicas per data centre. Version 5.0 modernised the storage engine with trie-based memtables and SSTables and the Unified Compaction Strategy.
ScyllaDB reimplements the same model in C++ and splits each node's data by CPU core, so each core owns its own slice of data. It now distributes data with tablets, smaller units that the cluster can move between nodes, recommended for all new clusters from 2026.1, and uses Raft for cluster metadata. ScyllaDB publishes performance comparisons; they are vendor claims, and we do not repeat them. Run your own workload if throughput or latency per node is the reason you are looking.
Compatibility: what carries over from Cassandra
Both use CQL, so schemas, queries and drivers look the same:
-- CQL: runs on Apache Cassandra and ScyllaDB
CREATE KEYSPACE telemetry
WITH replication = {'class': 'NetworkTopologyStrategy', 'dc1': 3};
CREATE TABLE telemetry.readings (
device_id text,
day date,
ts timestamp,
value double,
PRIMARY KEY ((device_id, day), ts)
) WITH CLUSTERING ORDER BY (ts DESC);
SELECT ts, value FROM telemetry.readings
WHERE device_id = 'd-42' AND day = '2026-11-07' LIMIT 100;The baseline differs, though. ScyllaDB's compatibility page describes it as a drop-in replacement for Cassandra 3.11, with additional features from 4.0, CQL native protocol v4 and some v5 features, and tools based on 3.11. It no longer supports Thrift (from ScyllaDB 6.0), does not support DateTieredCompactionStrategy (use TWCS), ignores some table options, marks user-defined functions as experimental, and rewrites Storage Attached Index definitions on vector columns to its native vector index. If you rely on Cassandra 4.x or 5.0 features, check each one on that page before migrating.
APIs, search and vectors
ScyllaDB adds Alternator, a DynamoDB-compatible API on the same cluster, which lets DynamoDB-style applications run outside AWS. Its 2026.3 release added full-text search over text columns with BM25 scoring, large-data guardrails and cluster-wide restore, and it offers vector search.
Cassandra 5.0 added Storage Attached Indexes (SAI), a vector data type with similarity functions, dynamic data masking, a CIDR authorizer and more guardrails. It has no DynamoDB API; Amazon Keyspaces is AWS's CQL-compatible service, which is not Apache Cassandra itself.
Operations, support and managed options
With Cassandra you operate the cluster (repair, compaction, capacity planning) or choose among third-party managed services and support vendors, such as DataStax Astra DB (now part of IBM) or Amazon Keyspaces, each with its own compatibility and pricing. The project itself sells nothing.
ScyllaDB ships companion tools (ScyllaDB Manager, the Monitoring Stack and a Kubernetes Operator) and runs ScyllaDB X Cloud, billed on demand by the hour or on 1-year or 3-year subscriptions with prepaid Flex Credits. One vendor for software, support and hosting is simpler to buy, but it also means a single supplier and licence holder for your data layer.
Pricing and licensing
Apache Cassandra is free under the Apache License 2.0, with no paid edition from the project. Costs are your own infrastructure and operations, or third-party managed services and support, each priced by its own vendor.
ScyllaDB. Self-managed use is free under the licence only for organisations that have not been paying customers in the previous 12 months, up to 10 TB of total storage and 50 vCPUs; beyond that a commercial licence is required, priced by quote. ScyllaDB X Cloud publishes no rates on scylladb.com/pricing (checked 7 November 2026): it is billed by instance type, storage, plan and deployment model, on demand by the hour or by 1-year or 3-year subscription with Flex Credits, plus cloud network and backup costs. The page offers a calculator, a 30-day developer trial and a 48-hour production evaluation.
Pricing checked on the vendors' official pages on 7 November 2026. Prices change; confirm before buying.
Where each one leads
Apache Cassandra strengths
- Apache 2.0 licence with no limits on size, cores or who may use it
- Vendor-neutral Apache project with a choice of support and managed service providers
- Cassandra 5.0 features: SAI, vector type, Unified Compaction Strategy, dynamic data masking
- Several maintained release lines (5.0, 4.1, 4.0)
- The reference implementation that CQL-compatible products measure themselves against
ScyllaDB strengths
- Runs CQL applications and also offers a DynamoDB-compatible API (Alternator)
- Tablets-based data distribution and Raft-managed cluster metadata in current releases
- One vendor for software, support and the managed X Cloud service
- Full-text search with BM25 scoring and vector search in recent releases
- Free self-managed use for small estates within the licence limits
Limitations
Apache Cassandra limitations
- No managed service or commercial support from the project itself
- Operating clusters (repair, compaction, JVM tuning, capacity) needs specialist skills
- Lightweight, single-partition transactions only in 5.0
- No DynamoDB-compatible API
ScyllaDB limitations
- No longer open source; free use is capped at 10 TB and 50 vCPUs and excluded for recent customers
- Licence assigns modifications to ScyllaDB and forbids offering it as a service
- No published prices for X Cloud or commercial licences
- Compatibility baseline is Cassandra 3.11 with some 4.0 features, not 5.0
- Lightweight transactions only; strongly consistent keyspaces are still experimental
When to choose each
Choose Apache Cassandra if
- Your organisation requires an OSI-approved licence for the database
- You want to avoid dependence on a single vendor for software and hosting
- You need Cassandra 4.x or 5.0 features such as SAI or the vector type exactly as Cassandra implements them
- You have, or will hire, a team that can operate Cassandra, or you prefer a third-party managed service
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You want a vendor-managed Cassandra-style service from the database's own maker
- You run DynamoDB-style applications and want them outside AWS through Alternator
- Your estate fits the free limits, or you are ready to buy a commercial licence
- You are interested in ScyllaDB's per-core engine and tablets and will validate them on your workload
When neither is right
- You need joins, ad hoc analytics or multi-row ACID transactions: see SQL vs NoSQL, or distributed SQL in CockroachDB vs YugabyteDB.
- You want a flexible document model rather than query-driven tables: see Cassandra vs MongoDB.
- You are on AWS and want a fully serverless key-value service: see DynamoDB vs Cosmos DB.
- Your data is mainly time series from devices: see best time series databases.
Final recommendation
For most teams the licence decides this comparison. Apache Cassandra is the open source, vendor-neutral choice with the newest feature set of the CQL family, at the cost of running it yourself or through a third party. ScyllaDB is a serious engine with an attractive single-vendor package, including X Cloud and a DynamoDB API, but it is now commercial software with a limited free tier. If you need open source, pick Cassandra; if you want ScyllaDB's engine and support and accept its licence, get a quote, check the compatibility page against your schema, and run your own workload on both before committing.
Frequently asked questions
Is ScyllaDB still open source?
No. ScyllaDB Open Source 6.2.x under the AGPL was the final open source release. From 2025.1 the product is source-available under the ScyllaDB Software License Agreement, which allows free use only for non-customers up to 10 TB and 50 vCPUs.
Is ScyllaDB a drop-in replacement for Cassandra?
ScyllaDB describes itself as a drop-in replacement for Cassandra 3.11 with some 4.0 features, and it uses CQL, so drivers and most schemas carry over. Thrift is not supported from ScyllaDB 6.0, some compaction strategies and table options differ, and Cassandra 5.0 features may not map one to one, so check its compatibility page.
Does either support multi-partition ACID transactions?
Not in current releases. Cassandra 5.0 offers lightweight transactions within a single partition, and ScyllaDB documents lightweight transactions too. Design writes so that each operation touches one partition, or choose a distributed SQL database.
Is there a managed Cassandra service?
Not from the Apache project. Third parties run Cassandra or compatible services, for example DataStax Astra DB (IBM) and Amazon Keyspaces, which is CQL-compatible but not Apache Cassandra. ScyllaDB runs its own managed ScyllaDB X Cloud.
How much does ScyllaDB cost?
ScyllaDB publishes no rates. Self-managed use is free within the licence limits; beyond that a commercial licence is priced by quote. X Cloud is billed on demand by the hour or on 1-year or 3-year subscriptions; use the calculator or ask for a quote.
Sources
- Apache Cassandra downloads
- Cassandra 5.0: new features
- apache/cassandra repository and licence (GitHub)
- ScyllaDB source-available licensing FAQ
- ScyllaDB Software License Agreement (GitHub)
- ScyllaDB: Apache Cassandra compatibility
- ScyllaDB 2026.3 release announcement
- ScyllaDB pricing
Checked November 2026.
How we research comparisons: our editorial method.