Skip to content
Comparison · AWS

AWS Database Services Compared: RDS, Aurora, DynamoDB & More

AWS offers more than 15 database services, each built around a data model: relational, key-value, document, in-memory, graph, wide-column, time series and analytics. This hub explains what each AWS database is for, compares them in one decision table, and points to our detailed guides, starting with Amazon RDS.

Facts checked 8 October 2026 against the providers' official documentation and pricing pages. Next review due January 2027. Cloud services, regions and prices change often; confirm on the provider's site before you buy.
Short answer
  • For a standard relational database, start with Amazon RDS (PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle, Db2) or Amazon Aurora (MySQL- and PostgreSQL-compatible, with serverless and distributed options).
  • For key-value access at very large scale with no servers to manage, AWS points to DynamoDB; for MongoDB-style documents, DocumentDB; for Cassandra workloads, Keyspaces.
  • ElastiCache is a cache in front of another database; MemoryDB is a durable in-memory primary database. Neptune is for graphs and Timestream for time series.
  • Redshift is a data warehouse for analytics (OLAP), not an application database; AWS's own database decision guide treats it separately.
  • Many applications combine services, for example Aurora for orders, DynamoDB for sessions and ElastiCache for caching, which is the pattern AWS itself describes.
How we know: Research-based: service descriptions, data models and use cases were checked on 8 October 2026 against each service's AWS product page, the AWS decision guide "Choosing an AWS database service", the Amazon RDS User Guide and the Oracle Database@AWS User Guide. We have not deployed these services for this comparison; the "when to use" guidance combines AWS's stated use cases with our editorial assessment, marked as such.

Which AWS database should you use?

AWS describes its database portfolio as purpose-built: more than 15 options covering relational, key-value, document, in-memory, graph, time series, vector and wide-column models. Start from the shape of your data and how you query it, then pick the service built for that model. The table condenses AWS's decision guide and product pages.

AWS database services at a glance (October 2026)
ServiceData modelUse it whenWatch out for
Amazon RDSRelationalYou want a managed PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle or Db2 instanceInstance-based capacity; you size and scale it
Amazon AuroraRelational (MySQL, PostgreSQL compatible)You want higher throughput, distributed storage or Aurora ServerlessOnly MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility; different pricing model
Aurora DSQLRelational, distributedActive-active multi-Region SQL with no servers to managePostgreSQL-compatible, not identical to PostgreSQL
Amazon DynamoDBKey-value and documentSession stores, carts and other high-scale access by keyData must be modelled around access patterns
Amazon DocumentDBDocument (MongoDB compatible)JSON-like documents queried across fieldsMongoDB API compatibility, not MongoDB itself
Amazon KeyspacesWide-column (Cassandra compatible)Moving Cassandra workloads, high write throughputCassandra query model (CQL)
Amazon ElastiCacheIn-memory cache (Valkey, Memcached, Redis OSS)Caching to cut read latency in front of another databaseDesigned as an ephemeral cache
Amazon MemoryDBDurable in-memory (Valkey, Redis OSS)A primary database needing in-memory speed and durabilitySized by memory, so compare its cost with a disk-based database
Amazon NeptuneGraphSocial networks, fraud detection, recommendations, GraphRAGGraph query skills required
Amazon TimestreamTime seriesIoT data, application metrics, asset trackingTwo engines (LiveAnalytics and InfluxDB) with different capabilities
Amazon RedshiftColumnar data warehouseAnalytics and reporting over large data volumesNot an OLTP application database

Relational AWS databases: RDS, Aurora and Oracle options

Amazon RDS is the managed home for six familiar engines. AWS handles provisioning, patching, backups and failover; you choose an instance class and storage. The RDS User Guide recommends RDS as the default choice for most relational deployments. See What is AWS RDS, RDS pricing and the RDS free tier.

Amazon Aurora offers MySQL- and PostgreSQL-compatible editions on a fault-tolerant, distributed storage layer, with Aurora Serverless for automatic capacity scaling. AWS's decision guide suggests it when migrating or modernising a relational workload. Two newer variants extend it: Aurora DSQL, a serverless, PostgreSQL-compatible distributed SQL database with active-active multi-Region replication, and Aurora PostgreSQL Limitless Database, which shards a single logical database for write throughput beyond one Aurora instance. Compare the two families in Amazon RDS vs Amazon Aurora.

Oracle Database in AWS

There are three documented routes. RDS for Oracle is the managed option, with licence-included or bring-your-own-licence models. RDS Custom for Oracle gave OS-level access, but AWS has announced its end of support on 31 March 2027 and recommends moving those workloads to EC2. Oracle Database@AWS runs Oracle Exadata infrastructure and Oracle Autonomous Database, managed by Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, inside AWS data centres and is bought through AWS Marketplace. Self-managed Oracle on EC2 remains possible for full control.

Key-value, document and wide-column: DynamoDB, DocumentDB, Keyspaces

Amazon DynamoDB is a serverless, fully managed, distributed NoSQL database with single-digit millisecond performance; AWS highlights zero infrastructure management, pay-per-request billing and multi-Region global tables designed for 99.999% availability. In our assessment it fits best when you know your access patterns up front, because tables are designed around keys rather than ad hoc joins. See DynamoDB vs PostgreSQL and DynamoDB vs MongoDB.

Amazon DocumentDB (with MongoDB compatibility) stores JSON-like documents and is compatible with MongoDB APIs and drivers, so AWS says applications can typically migrate without code changes. Compatibility is with the API, so confirm the features you rely on before moving; our MongoDB hosting guide compares it with MongoDB Atlas and self-hosting.

Amazon Keyspaces (for Apache Cassandra) is serverless and lets you keep Cassandra Query Language code, drivers and tools by changing the endpoint. It suits teams already invested in Cassandra.

In-memory: ElastiCache vs MemoryDB

Both speak Valkey and Redis OSS, but they play different roles. AWS's decision guide describes ElastiCache as optimised for microsecond reads and sub-millisecond writes as an ephemeral cache for frequently accessed data; it also supports Memcached and has serverless and node-based options. MemoryDB is a durable in-memory database that stores data using a Multi-AZ transaction log, suitable as a primary database for microservices that need very low latency. Use ElastiCache in front of RDS or Aurora; use MemoryDB when the in-memory store is the system of record. Our Redis vs PostgreSQL comparison covers the engine side.

Graph, time series and analytics: Neptune, Timestream, Redshift

Amazon Neptune is AWS's graph database for modelling complex networks such as social graphs, fraud detection and recommendation engines. AWS lists up to 128 TiB of storage and up to 15 read replicas per cluster, plus managed GraphRAG with Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases.

Amazon Timestream is for data tied to timestamps, such as IoT readings and application metrics. It now has two engines: Timestream for LiveAnalytics and Timestream for InfluxDB, which runs open-source InfluxDB as a managed service. AWS's Timestream page points users looking for LiveAnalytics-style capabilities to Timestream for InfluxDB.

Amazon Redshift is a fully managed, cloud-based data warehouse for large-scale analytics, with a serverless option. AWS's database decision guide treats it separately from its OLTP databases. Use it for reporting and analysis, often fed from RDS or Aurora; see Redshift vs PostgreSQL.

Serverless AWS databases and combining services

AWS lists its serverless database offerings as Aurora DSQL, Aurora Serverless, DynamoDB, ElastiCache, Keyspaces, Timestream for LiveAnalytics and Neptune Serverless. These scale with demand and bill for use, which suits spiky or unpredictable workloads; instance-based RDS is usually more predictable for steady ones. Our serverless databases guide explains the trade-offs.

AWS also recommends mixing databases where it helps. Its decision guide gives an e-commerce example: DocumentDB for product catalogues and user profiles, DynamoDB for low-latency catalogue browsing, and Aurora for inventory and orders where transactions matter. In our view, start with one relational database and add a specialised service only when a workload clearly needs it, since each service adds operations, cost and data movement.

When no AWS database is the right fit

  • You need a database that runs identically on several clouds or on premises: a self-managed engine on EC2 or a multi-cloud provider avoids AWS-specific APIs.
  • You want developer features such as database branching and scale to zero for many small Postgres databases: see Neon vs AWS RDS and Supabase vs AWS RDS.
  • You are standardised on Microsoft or Google: compare AWS RDS vs Azure SQL Database and AWS RDS vs Google Cloud SQL.
  • Your workload is small and local, such as an embedded app database: SQLite may be enough.

Frequently asked questions

What are the main AWS database services?

Relational: Amazon RDS and Amazon Aurora (including Aurora DSQL). NoSQL: DynamoDB (key-value), DocumentDB (document), Keyspaces (wide-column), Neptune (graph) and Timestream (time series). In-memory: ElastiCache and MemoryDB. Analytics: Redshift.

What is the difference between Amazon RDS and DynamoDB?

RDS runs relational engines with SQL, joins and transactions on instances you size. DynamoDB is a serverless NoSQL key-value and document database with pay-per-request billing and automatic scaling; it is designed around known access patterns rather than ad hoc SQL.

Can I run Oracle Database on AWS?

Yes: Amazon RDS for Oracle (managed), Oracle Database@AWS (Oracle-managed Exadata and Autonomous Database inside AWS data centres), or self-managed on EC2. RDS Custom for Oracle reaches end of support on 31 March 2027.

Is Amazon Redshift a database?

It is a data warehouse: a database optimised for analytical queries over large volumes, not for the many small reads and writes of an application. AWS positions it separately from its OLTP databases.

Which AWS databases are serverless?

AWS lists Aurora DSQL, Aurora Serverless, DynamoDB, ElastiCache (serverless option), Keyspaces, Timestream for LiveAnalytics and Neptune Serverless. Redshift also has a serverless option.

Which AWS database is cheapest?

It depends on usage. Serverless services such as DynamoDB and Aurora DSQL bill for what you use and have always-free allowances, which suits small or idle workloads; for steady workloads, a right-sized RDS instance with a Reserved Instance is often more predictable. See RDS pricing for worked examples.

Sources

Checked 8 October 2026.

How we research cloud database guides: our editorial method. CodeWithSQL earns nothing from the providers mentioned.

Choosing where to run your database?

Start with the section overview, or compare providers side by side.